r/technology • u/MarvelsGrantMan136 • 16h ago
Business SpaceX stock drops to a new low and loses $1 trillion in value in a month
https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-stock-drops-new-low-ipo-price-starship-launch-scrubbed-2026-71.6k
u/turb0_encapsulator 16h ago
it's still worth 10x what it should be worth. same with Tesla. I honestly don't understand the hold this man has over markets.
779
u/entered_bubble_50 15h ago edited 3h ago
It's hard to place any value on those shares at all.
Forget about conventional fundamentals. Elon owns 70% of the voting shares. If SpaceX ever makes a profit, he will give it all to himself as salary and bonuses. He has no incentive whatsoever to issue a dividend to shareholders. That's exactly how he operates Tesla.
Shareholders will never see a single cent. So are the shares truly worth anything at all?
Edit: A lot of people are responding with the same thing, so I will respond to them here:
But lots of companies don't pay dividends? If the share goes up in value, I'm making money. Why do I care if it comes from the share valuation increasing or dividends?
One question: where are your gains coming from? It's not the company - it's other investors. If your only profits are from other investors, then it's a pyramid scheme, not an investment.
Of course, dividends aren't the only mechanism for sharing profits - there are also share buy backs. But the same lack of incentive applies for that too. Also, I don't believe Tesla has ever had a buy back programme. Elon does not believe in sharing profits with investors period.
206
u/turb0_encapsulator 15h ago
this is an excellent point that I have never thought about.
→ More replies (16)41
u/WarOnFlesh 10h ago
no one expects to make money off the company. they expect to make money off the next greater fool. they don't care about the company. they are just investing in the idea that hype will push it higher and someone else will buy it for more later.
it's basically beanie babies.
no one bought beanie babies because they thought they were profitable as an underlying asset. it was hype. same thing here
→ More replies (1)148
u/IAmDotorg 14h ago
It's a ponzi scheme -- they have a value on the belief that someone else will decide they have a higher value... on the belief that someone after that will decide they have an even higher value.
It's mostly people with a lot of liquidity taking advantage of the swings and profiting on the losses from less liquid/less experienced investors.
45
u/Beard_o_Bees 13h ago
I still maintain that replacing the traditional retirement pension with what basically amounts to placing your retirement savings into a casino, was one of the biggest cons ever perpetrated in America.
→ More replies (11)15
u/versusChou 13h ago
That's not really what a Ponzi Scheme is. Musk isn't accepting investments and paying out to earlier investors with that money. It's more like the Greater Fool Theory or a Speculative Bubble. People are buying it, not because they believe it will ever pay back, but because they expect someone else in the future is willing to pay more for it. Musk's wealth is simply growing because he's got a ton of the stock that people are speculating on. If it ever all collapsed to what it really probably should be worth, he would lose a ton. Of course he's certainly diversified a bit and got a good amount of liquid capital, so he'll never become destitute.
→ More replies (1)57
u/KaleScared4667 14h ago
You just described he entire modern day stock market
48
u/turb0_encapsulator 13h ago
It's not really the same. Other trillion dollar companies trade at ~30x earnings, whereas Tesla trades at 350x earnings, and it isn't even a growing company at this point. SpaceX trades at over 50x *revenue* and isn't profitable and never has been.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (1)9
u/Synaps4 12h ago
Other companies have sold more than 50% of voting shares so that it's theoretically possible to take over the company and buy its profits if shares get low enough.
For companies like spacex where you can never buy enough for meaningful voting, you are entirely at the whim of whoever owns those shares. If they run the company to zero there's nothing you can do, no matter how cheap it gets, to get any of its profit. It's more like donating money than investing.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (32)8
u/yanginatep 12h ago
Investors nowadays don't seem to care about dividends. All they care about is infinite growth line goes up.
Being profitable isn't enough. Companies have to be forever growing.
→ More replies (1)82
u/_Zambayoshi_ 15h ago
He's a Pied Piper. He plays his merry tune and the rats follow him. Do the rats know where they're going? Probably not. But the music is so enticing.
8
u/Riversntallbuildings 14h ago
Don’t you mean “Hooli CEO” ? At least Pied Piper had a product ;)
-HBO Silicon Valley reference
8
u/UNC_Samurai 11h ago
Elon went from Peter to Gavin to Russ in the span of a decade.
→ More replies (2)117
u/Helenium_autumnale 15h ago
He's selling dreams in an increasingly broken world. And there's always a market for that. Go to Mars! Make millions with supercool Rocket Stocks! Your car drives itself and it's 200% safe!
The reality is something different. (Tesla is #1 for fatal road accidents)
→ More replies (16)35
u/WitchesSphincter 15h ago
"A normal car gets into an accident here, you'll be severely injured or dead. Meanwhile the new* Tesla full self drive* would not only avoid it, but cure your old football injury for your trouble. "
9
7
u/Johannes_Keppler 13h ago
The link does hint at the type of people driving Teslas being the biggest risk factor, not even the cars themselves. It's just assholes dying at double the average rate.
21
u/Spotttty 13h ago
The shitty thing is even if Tesla went under and SpaceX imploded he would still live a life better than 99.9% of the people in the world. He is never going broke. He is never going to prison.
→ More replies (1)5
12
u/-Tom- 13h ago
Teslas stock is worth more than every other auto manufacturers stock put together. That's insane.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (50)9
u/StoppableHulk 14h ago
I honestly don't understand the hold this man has over markets.
You're thinking about it the wrong way. The reality is that the markets have a hold over themselves by virtue of not wanting the value to go down.
If enough people remain irrational then the value never goes down. Elon Musk pumps out just enough propaganda so that even though it's ridiculous, it's something that someone who is in willful denial can use to remain in their course of action, which gets them money.
255
u/Shoehorse13 15h ago
So Elon is the first ex-trillionaire?
→ More replies (1)154
u/colombogangsta 12h ago edited 10h ago
Yeah and the biggest loser in the history of mankind.
No one lost as much as Musk in net wealth which is $240B in a single day which was June 22, 2026. For reference, the second richest person’s net wealth is $284B.
Of course those valuations are delusional and not real, but I take it as a way to call him the biggest loser ever!
→ More replies (16)
466
u/a4mula 16h ago
And now the shorts are starting to stack, which is going to generate its own gravity well that requires a bit more than a slide rule to overcome.
140
→ More replies (18)6
1.5k
u/SecularTech 16h ago
Totally predictable over-hyped scam to fleece retail investors. The insiders made thiers.
417
u/moistbuddhas 15h ago
Yep, we havent even got to the day where the employees, who have multiple millions now, can sell. There is only more sales coming when these employees liquidate parts of their shares since they are multi-millionares on paper, and they are going to want to live like ones immediately.
Employees cannot sell right now, but they get multiple early unlocks before the full 180‑day lockup ends.
- From the S‑1:20% unlock after Q2 earnings (Aug 2026)
+10% performance unlock if SPCX trades 30% above IPO price
+7% unlocks at days 70, 90, 105, 120, 135
+28% unlock after Q3 earnings
Full unlock at 180 days (Dec 2026)
272
u/TheMurmuring 15h ago
And every unlock is going to make it drop further and further.
→ More replies (5)128
u/binzersguy 15h ago
Let’s hope so. I want to see it at $10
→ More replies (7)57
u/Weakonomics 14h ago
I'd buy that for a Nickel!
→ More replies (1)49
u/AMEFOD 14h ago
If we are entering a dystopian hell scape, at least quote a “good” movie.
“I’d buy that for a dollar!!”
→ More replies (3)22
u/Tarheels988 15h ago
Is the lookout period a law? Could an employee negotiate to remove it?
→ More replies (9)45
u/Sirbunbun 15h ago
No, it’s part of the stock agreement with the company and the SEC. It would go against rules around insider trading and stock classes.
→ More replies (14)29
u/jpj625 15h ago
The employees with a significant stake aren't selling.
Anyone with more than about $5M doesn't need to sell to start using the shares as collateral or in exchanges. At this level, the whole game is avoiding taxes.
→ More replies (4)46
u/h28200 15h ago
Better to pay tax on gains than incur a loss, the way Spcx is trading they'll probably sell whatever they can when allowed.
→ More replies (1)12
u/ChapekElders 15h ago
The average cost basis many of these employees had is less than 1/10th the current share price.
→ More replies (6)48
u/etaoin314 15h ago
insiders are still locked up for a few more days....I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop..
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (28)65
u/Vanman04 15h ago
One would think so yet Tesla stock still remains completely untethered from reality.
21
u/Neither-Signature-81 15h ago
Yeah but with Tesla stock a lot of people made a bunch of money and if they don’t sell they just lose a little gain. With spacex its the opposite lol the only people investing are getting hosed
9
u/PLeuralNasticity 14h ago
Because Tesla is the most manipulated stock on the market since it went public
→ More replies (1)
206
u/TheWindowMerchant 15h ago
When a company loses a trillion dollars in valuation in a month and nobody on the executive team seems even remotely concerned about losing their job, don’t you think that there might be something fishy going on?
96
u/Sea_Pomegranate_4499 14h ago
Elon declined any pre-IPO price discovery, he just told the underwriters what the price was going to be and built a prospectus around that number to justify it. No one has to wonder, it is all clear as day what is going on.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)9
510
429
u/Crafty_Ish1973 16h ago
Good. The more Elon loses, the better.
227
u/Aware-Instance-210 16h ago
Until the losses will be socialized and paid by the taxpayer
87
→ More replies (3)37
u/chaoticneutral262 15h ago
More likely, socialized and paid for by our retirement plans. SpaceX pressured various stock market indexes to change their rules so as to include SPCX, which wouldn't have qualified otherwise. As a result, many of the mutual funds and ETFs in our IRA and 401(k) accounts bought SPCX at or near the high.
It was a clever way for Musk to transfer billions from retail investors to SpaceX's coffers.
→ More replies (2)44
u/trisul-108 16h ago
He's not loosing anything, the question is simply whether how many billions he manufactured out of thin air ... 1000 billion, 900 billion, 800 billion or less.
→ More replies (2)31
u/Equivalent_Action748 15h ago
Well, lowering the amount of fake money he has is still better than increasing the rate in which he generates it
18
u/Substantial-Wish6468 15h ago
Elon's not the loser in this, the bag holders who bought his stock are. It was a bullshit valuation but people still bought it.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (21)19
28
u/morbihann 16h ago
According to their own documentation they are mainly an AI company that cant make use of their own datacenters and rent them out.
What does that tell you ?
→ More replies (12)
73
u/mtranda 16h ago
How does one "lose" something they never had?
29
u/Klutzy-Condition811 16h ago
Oh don't worry they gained from it at the expense of those stupid enough to invest at the peak and retail index fund investors who had no choice.
→ More replies (4)16
u/Kershiser22 15h ago
Well, presumably there are people who bought SPCX at $210 and are currently holding it at $125. So they have an unrealized loss of $85. But they are still out the $210 cash.
147
151
u/CyberSmith31337 15h ago
It’s not that $1tn was lost; $1 tn were extracted from retail investors who served as exit liquidity for insiders.
We need to start talking about these things as they are. The money didn’t vanish; it was pulled out and left retail holding the bag.
67
u/JUGGER_DEATH 15h ago
No, the total float was worth $86 billion. That is a ceiling on what wad ”extracted”.
17
u/steppe5 11h ago
Thank you. Not enough people realize that these numbers are make believe. Elon was never a trillionaire and nobody lost a trillion dollars. It's all bullshit.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (23)32
u/RS_S64 15h ago
The float for SPCX is a very small portion of the overall equity so the $1tn was only paper gains, the actual money lost is much lower. For most investors (that had their shares locked up), they didn't actually have any realized losses - current share value is fairly close to the valuations pre-IPO, so they just had writeups and writedowns to end up in a similar position to pre-IPO.
→ More replies (1)
52
u/bombayblue 16h ago
Hopefully this is a good lesson for everyone on the differences between realized and unrealized gains.
Couldn’t have happened to a better person lol
5
u/slosha69 15h ago
The difference means very little when a $1T loss in market cap won't break the bank. The mega yacht is still sailing and the private plane is still flying.
→ More replies (1)
19
u/Generic_Commenter-X 15h ago
He'll just promise self-driving rocket ships and the stock price will go over 3000.
→ More replies (4)
9
42
u/Yeti_Urine 16h ago
Um does that mean our 401ks are all being robbed by this shit?
18
u/Jarocket 15h ago
Space ex is an AI company and might influence other related AI companies prices, but in reality space ex is a Musk company and the normal rules don’t apply.
As far as being in your 401k. Things like the S&P 500 require being listed for a year and critically for spcx 4 quarters of positive income. Space ex just lights money on fire so it won’t be included.
Nasdaq-100 changed its rules specifically to let it in though.
→ More replies (6)42
u/FrankDrebinOnReddit 15h ago
For most people, no, since it hasn't been added to the S&P 500 yet.
→ More replies (15)
42
14
22
31
6
6
6
u/approximately_exact 12h ago
It is unfathomable how these profitless companies with a pittance for revenue are worth trillions of dollars. I don't know where we went wrong, but wrong we went.
10
5
4
5
5
6
u/ryannelsn 15h ago
Does anyone remember when he said he wouldn't take Space X public until he had regular flights to and from Mars?
→ More replies (2)
5
u/CompotSexi 14h ago
It was all a hoax for a bunch of rich guys to make a lot of money, and for Elon to mark his name as the first "trilionaire".
5
u/MiserableResort2688 14h ago
any company that can lose 1 trillon of value that fast was never worth it to begin with clearly
5
4
u/Old-Push9343 11h ago
It's just insane how they have overvalued this company, as if they were going to land in the Moon next week, in Mars next month, and start mining asteroids in a year.
Also, the whole notion of data centers in space seems so absurd to me. I am not saying it will never happen, but it's not something that makes any sense to me for at least like, maybe 50 to 100 years?
→ More replies (2)
10
6.7k
u/TheWhyOfFry 16h ago
Still overpriced, especially with Twitter stink all over it.